AHRI and HARDI Challenge New York Hydrofluorocarbon Refrigerant Restrictions
Key Highlights
- AHRI and HARDI filed an appeal against New York's restrictions on Hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants used in HVACR equipment.
- The organizations argue that the regulations were enacted without proper administrative procedures and lack market support.
- The appeal seeks to overturn the regulations, citing concerns over enforcement, costs, and refrigerant availability.
ARLINGTON, Virginia — AHRI and Heating Air-Conditioning Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) have filed an appeal in a New York State case involving restrictions on Hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants used in HVACR equipment.
The organizations submitted a Notice of Appeal to the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, Third Judicial Department, following a Dec. 22, 2025 decision in In the Matter of HARDI and AHRI v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The lower court ruling upheld broad limits on refrigerants that can be used in air conditioners, heat pumps, refrigeration equipment, and water heaters.
According to AHRI and HARDI, New York State did not follow proper administrative procedure when implementing the amended Part 494 Hydrofluorocarbon Standards and Reporting Regulations. The groups are seeking reversal of the decision and continue to call for annulment of the regulations, citing concerns related to enforcement, cost, and the availability of compliant refrigerants.
“AHRI opposes this ruling, which, if left in place, would greatly burden both consumers and manufacturers,” said Stephen Yurek, president and CEO of AHRI. He added that the decision does not address concerns about current market conditions, compliance demands, or the feasibility of implementing the regulations.
Talbot Gee, CEO of HARDI, said the requirements in Part 494 are not currently supported by available products or safety standards for the refrigerant alternatives New York is requiring.
In its filing, AHRI and HARDI are asking the court to review whether the state violated the State Administrative Procedures Act when enacting the regulations. The appeal also requests review of whether New York considered market evidence, including provisions that restrict bulk regulated substances, ban substances with a global warming potential greater than 10 or 20 in some cases, and further regulate residential HVAC equipment.
Note: This piece was created with the help of generative AI tools and edited by our content team for clarity and accuracy.